IS ISRAEL ACTUALLY MORE ISOLATED THAN EVER?

Auteur: 
Giorgio Spagnol
Date de publication: 
28/7/2026

2026 sees Israel confront a complex and unprecedented strategic reality. Foreign relations are largely shaped in the shadow of the joint Israeli-American war in Iran, which has escalated into a regional conflict with ongoing fighting in Gaza, the West Bank, Syria, and Lebanon.

Current Situation

As of early 2026, the State of Israel finds itself almost exclusively dependent on American support, suffering from a compromised and isolated position in the international and regional arenas while forcefully shaping its own strategic environment.

These trends can be summarized as follows:

1. Erosion of Strategic Autonomy: The special relationship with the United States has taken on a distinct patron-client dynamic, with the Washington administration shaping and deciding on key issues, while public and political support for Israel in the United States reaches a new all-time low.

2. Distancing from the liberal-democratic world: Faced with growing criticism and deepening diplomatic isolation from the European Union and Western countries, Israel has chosen a policy of distancing, boycotting, and severing relations.

3. Challenge of regional fragmentation and integration: Arab countries have excluded Israel from regional integration processes.

Israel has intensified its modus operandi: accelerating annexation procedures in the West Bank while weakening the Palestinian Authority, delaying the implementation of political processes in Gaza, waging a campaign in Iran (which is strengthening Tehran's position), and waging intense fighting in Lebanon.

Israel is thus entangled on multiple fronts, diplomatically isolated, with a damaged international image, and without having achieved its strategic objectives.

Israel's Foreign Relations

Israel's foreign relations are largely shaped by the joint Israeli-American war against Iran, which has escalated into a regional war with open fronts in Gaza, the West Bank, Syria, and Lebanon.

Israel began 2026 almost entirely dependent on the United States, increasingly perceived as a pariah state by many publics in the region and globally, and inclined to shape its strategic environment through unilateral actions and the use of force.

Israel's autonomy has been further eroded by Trump's continued dictating key aspects of its foreign and security policy and defining its scope.

Israel has further distanced itself from the European Union, European states, and Western liberal public opinion, and has responded to criticism and condemnation of its policies by severing ties with international actors and boycotting them.

Israel's Growing Isolation

Growing regional and global isolation has not led Israel to change its policy on the Palestinian question or abandon its tendency to favor the projection of force over cooperation. On the Palestinian front, the Israeli government has accelerated annexation in the West Bank through legislation, approval of construction projects, and support for settler violence, along with efforts to weaken the Palestinian Authority to the point of collapse. In Gaza, it has delayed and hindered the implementation of Trump's plan.

Regionally, it has launched a war against Iran, which ultimately only strengthened Iran's regional and international position; it has waged a major military campaign in Lebanon despite the signing of an
agreement that has not yet been implemented; it has deepened the rift and rivalry with Turkey; and it has frozen the progress of the security agreement with Syria due to the shift in focus toward the Iranian and Lebanese scenarios.

Israel finds itself diplomatically isolated, mired in multiple military fronts, with a toxic global image, and without having achieved its security and strategic objectives.

Considerations
Mistrust and suspicion have deepened between Israel and the Arab countries of the region, united in criticizing and condemning Israeli policies in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Iran. The Jordanians categorically rejected a meeting between Netanyahu and King Abdullah that Israel wanted to facilitate. Saudi Arabia and Qatar bluntly rejected Trump's request to promote normalization with Israel as part of the agreement to end the war with Iran and reiterated that this would not happen without progress on the Palestinian path.

Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan signed a joint security agreement with a common reference to the Palestinian issue, presenting an alternative to regional cooperation frameworks that include Israel.

Israel and Turkey are intensifying their rivalry and estrangement: Turkey has criticized Israel's policies in Gaza and the West Bank, as well as its conduct in the war against Iran and in Syria. Mutual rhetoric has intensified, and Israel has been portrayed as a state exploiting the war to occupy additional territory throughout the Middle East. Israel, however, has recognized the Armenian genocide as a further source of blame and conflict in its confrontation with Turkey.

Meanwhile, the United States and Saudi Arabia have reached a civil nuclear agreement that allows Riyadh to build reactors with American technology and enrich uranium on its territory. The pact does not oblige Saudi Arabia to adhere to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection regime. This exemption could open the possibility of a bomb falling into Saudi hands. The agreement is fueling discontent in Israel, both among the governing majority and the parliamentary opposition.

Conclusion
International opposition to Israel's policies in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Iran is growing; global civil society is increasingly boycotting Israel and Israelis, while Israel is choosing to disengage and distance itself from the liberal democratic world. Many countries have criticized Israel's actions in various spheres, and tensions have emerged even with some of its closest friends, such as Germany and Italy.

Relations with Spain and South Africa are at a critical level. Proceedings have been initiated against Israel at the International Court of Justice in The Hague on charges of genocide in Gaza, and the International Criminal Court has issued additional arrest warrants against senior Israeli officials. Israel has been blacklisted as a party responsible for sexual violence in conflict zones.

Complaints have been filed in courts around the world against Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers who participated in the war in Gaza, while several states have imposed sanctions or banned the entry of senior Israeli officials.

Cultural, sports, and artistic figures and trade unions from around the world have called for an arms embargo on Israel, accusing it of genocide and systematic destruction in Gaza. They have also canceled visits to Israel and cooperation with Israelis, calling for a boycott of Israel and Israeli artists.

Researchers and academic associations have severed relations with Israeli institutions and researchers, while participation in academic research projects has declined sharply.